Senior policy advisor discusses Bush energy plan
TIMES-REPUBLICAN, Friday, September 7, 2001
by Bryan Schultz
Reed addresses power supply forum in Nevada
Nevada - Shortly after gaining the White House, President George W. Bush used the biomass facility in Nevada as a backdrop for unveiling his plans to form a national evergy policy.
The energy issue has come full circle, as Dr. Craig Reed, senior
policy advisor in the Office of the Secretary at the U.S. Department
of Energy, attended a power supply forum Thursday in Nevada to discuss
Bush's proposed plan.
"When the president started his term, he faced more serious
issues than whether the "W's were missing on White House keyboards,"
Reed said. "California contributes 12 percent of the gross
national product and was facing rolling blackouts and power supply
problems."
According to Reed, officials in the Bush administration hope the
nation learned a lesson from California: Drastic conservation is
simply not enough.
"California lost $2.3 billion in lost wages." he said.
"The economy grew by 25 percent, but no new power plants have
been built in the past 10 years."
Reed said, however, the problem facing California and the rest
of the nation is not simply building more power plants, but finding
ways to get the energy to where it neeed to go.
"Southern California had energy, they just couldn't get it north,"
he noted. "The nation's energy transmission system is completely
inadequate and there is no standard from region to region."
Reed said a highlight to the Bush plan is to create an "electricity
super-highway," an updated network of power lines, grids and transformers
from coast to coast. Not only would the network help power-starved
regions in evergencies, Reed said, it would promote investment and
business.
Even if the legislature passed the necessary bills to create such
a plan — bills needed to streamline the process of building the
infrastructure — Reed said America is eventually going to be even
more power-hungry.
Reed said 20 years from now, the U.S. will use approximately 175
quadrillion BTUs (or quads), up from the 98 quads currently used.
That massive amount of energy means further dependence upon foreign
countries unless changes are made, he noted.
"Even with a very aggressive conservation program, we could only
reduce that usage by 48 quads and at the current rate, we will only
increase domestic energy by one quad," he said.
According to Reed, if the country's power needs fell short by one
quad, the consequences would be devastating. One quad of evergy
is the equivalent of heating 15 million homes, providing elecricity
for 18 million homes, or driving171 billion miles.
Another Bush proposal is to further develop other sources of energy,
citing the fact that the U.S. relies far too heavily on natural
gas.
"Other countries are also starting to depend on natural gas, causing
price spikes and ultimately, shortages," Reed said.
The Bush administration also wants to move funding for solar and
wind research to the private sector, claiming the science is "mature."
"We will focus more heavily on biomass energy, fusion and hydrogen
power to help develop real breakthroughs," Reed claimed.
Nuclear power, long a highly-debated subject, could also help solve
the country's problems, according to the Bush plan, although Reed
said progress was unlikely until a solution for a permanent waste
disposal site could be found.
"France gets 80 percent of its electricity from nuclear plants,"
Reed said. "since the last reactors were built in the U.S., technology
has improved and the plants are even safer. New reactor designs
would be even safer than that."
What has been done so far, Reed said, has been of an administrative
nature.
"We are makingprogress on the areas that don't require legislation
— this was not a one-time issue."
Reed said the most importanat result of the proposed plans has
been dialogue.
"I hope the nation has had a wake-up call — we have ignored these
issues for years.
The complete national energy policy proposed by Bush can be found
at www.energy.gov
|